31-08-2013 t/m 4-09-2013 ESC Congres 2013 Amsterdam (NH)

Auteur Topic: 31-08-2013 t/m 4-09-2013 ESC Congres 2013 Amsterdam (NH)  (gelezen 27692 keer)

0 gebruikers (en 2 gasten bekijken dit topic.

oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #70 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 13:14:35
Hedenmiddag 14.00 uur livestream:

Bernard Gersh (Rochester, USA)
14:00 - 14:20 Management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: evidence and uncertainties
14:20 - 14:40 Open forum discussion
    
John Camm, FESC (London, GB)
14:45 - 15:05 The rise and fall of antiarrhythmic drugs
15:05 - 15:25 Open forum discussion


http://www.escardio.org/congresses/esc-2013/scientific-sessions/live/Pages/Live-2013.aspx


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #71 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 13:56:46
Dr. Jurrien Ten Berg, FESC / Dr. Ole Frobert, FESC

ESC TV 2013 - Hot Line I: TAO, PARIS, TASTE - Part 01

Dr. Jurrien Ten Berg, FESC / Prof. Philippe Gabriel Steg, FESC

ESC TV 2013 - Hot Line I: TAO, PARIS, TASTE - Part 02

Dr. Jurrien Ten Berg, FESC / Prof. George Dangas, FESC

SC TV 2013 - Hot Line I: TAO, PARIS, TASTE - Part 03


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #72 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 13:58:01
Assistant Professor Evgeny Shkolnik discusses the utility of deformation imaging in detecting reduced systolic function, allowing the opportunity for early treatment.

Interview with Dr Evgney Shkolnik - ESC 2013: Deformation imaging


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #73 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 17:13:26
Hedenavond 18.00 uur live te volgen: http://www.escardio.org/congresses/esc-2013/scientific-sessions/live/Pages/Live-2013.aspx

The Awards Ceremony will be held on Monday 2 September 2013 from 18:00 to 19:00 in the hub (Central Village)

The European Society of Cardiology is proud to honour a certain number of abstract & clinical case presenters in recognition of their excellent work presented during the ESC Congress 2013.

Young Investigators Awards

These prestigious awards illustrate the ESC's dedication to support original research and scientific excellence. Four abstracts submitted by investigators under the age of 35 will be selected for this competition in the following categories: basic science, coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation, thrombosis, population sciences and clinical Science.
These categories will be the subject of five sessions on Sunday 1 September at lunch time. International panels of experts will select a winner to receive a € 2 000 prize. The runner ups will each receive € 1 000. The research manuscripts are expected to be submitted for potential publication in one of ESC Journals.

Moderated Poster Prizes

Posters are a major component of the scientific presentations at ESC Congress. Moderated posters are a combination between an oral presentation of key results and a traditional poster display. Once again, the moderated posters will be presented in sessions of 8 posters during coffee breaks in Village 9. From these, the best posters will be selected and their presenters will be awarded a diploma and free registration for next ESC Congress.

Top Graded Posters

In each of the seven poster sessions, for each of the main topic presented, we have highlighted the research which rated highest in its poster group.  Presenters are invited to join in the Award Ceremony and collect a diploma in acknowledgement of the quality of their work.

Best Cases from the ESC Cardiologists of Tomorrow

Four clinical cases will be presented during a special session to be held on Monday 2 September from 14:00 to 15:30. Four cardiologists under 35 will present their cases in front of an international panel of experts. the winner will receive a € 2 000 prize and the runner ups will each be awarded with a € 1 000 prize.


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #74 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 17:32:38
Dr. William A. Zoghbi discusses the Hokusai VTE study, presented at the European Society of Cardiology's 2013 Congress.

Commentary: The Hokusai VTE study


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #75 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 21:31:50
Prof. Massimo Lombardi discusses the development of cardiac MRI from an exotic technique to a routine cost-effective procedure and addresses a vote on merging the professional bodies that represent cardiac imagers.

Interview with Prof. Massimo Lombardi - ESC 2013: Cardiac MRI


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #76 Gepost op: 2 september 2013, 21:33:14
In this 2 minute video, filmed at the ESC congress, Dr Lukas Dekker discusses the clinical value of a new X-ray image processing algorithm.

Interview with Dr Lukas Dekker - ESC 2013: RCT reveals reduced radiation dose


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #78 Gepost op: 3 september 2013, 08:14:26
Amsterdam, The Netherlands – Tuesday 3 September 2013: An emergency department strategy that uses two biomarkers to triage patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can increase the rate of early, safe hospital discharge, according to results of the Biomarkers in Cardiology 8 (BIC-8) trial.

“This biomarker strategy using a state-of-the-art quantitative troponin assay in combination with an ultrasensitive copeptin assay has the potential to change clinical practice with high patient safety,” said lead investigator Martin Möckel, MD, PhD, from Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, in Berlin, Germany.

“This is the first interventional trial to study whether it is safe to discharge suspected ACS patients who test troponin and copeptin negative at admission. Using this strategy, a high proportion of patients could be discharged early, thus unnecessary treatments and resources could be saved, causing a substantial benefit for patients and health care providers.”

Emergency departments worldwide face increasing overcrowding and patients with signs and symptoms which might be caused by an acute coronary syndrome are very common, even though only around 15% of these patients are ultimately diagnosed with an acute myocardial infarction as the underlying disease, explained Dr. Möckel.

“Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is therefore a major clinical need, saving the health care system time and resources and patients unnecessary stress, anxiety and other risks associated with hospitalization.”
Current guidelines recommend that patients receive serial troponin testing to confirm that hospital discharge is appropriate, but this testing delays definitive action, he said.
“The new biomarker copeptin has been shown to be elevated in patients first presenting with acute MI, and when combined with the  cardiac troponin biomarker has an excellent negative predictive value for acute MI.  However, an early discharge strategy based on combining these two tests has never been assessed prospectively.”
BIC-8, a multicentre, open, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 902 patients with an initial negative troponin test to assess this strategy.

In the experimental arm (n=451), patients with a negative copeptin test (less than 10 pmol/L) were discharged into ambulant care, with a scheduled outpatient visit within 72 hours, while those with a positive copeptin test  received standard treatment according to current guidelines.

Among patients in the standard arm (n=451), copeptin results were not available to treating staff and patients were treated according to current guidelines.

At 30 days of follow-up the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar in both groups (5.46% in the experimental arm vs 5.5% in the standard arm), but emergency room discharge rates were significantly higher in the experimental arm (66% vs 12%; P < 0.001).

The results support the consideration of a new treatment algorithm in low-to-intermediate risk patients with suspected ACS, said Dr. Möckel.

“Patients with a negative troponin and a negative copeptin result at admission can safely be discharged if the final clinical assessment is consistent with this decision, as long as a timely diagnostic work-up is done in the outpatient setting,” he said.
  
However, the clinical judgment of the treating physician is of utmost importance, he stressed.
“If his or her final clinical assessment excludes discharge due to high suspicion of ACS, perhaps due to recurrent symptoms or an updated history, the patient should not be discharged despite negative biomarker results.”AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands – An emergency department strategy that uses two biomarkers to triage patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can increase the rate of early, safe hospital discharge, according to results of the Biomarkers in Cardiology 8 (BIC-8) trial.

“This biomarker strategy using a state-of-the-art quantitative troponin assay in combination with an ultrasensitive copeptin assay has the potential to change clinical practice with high patient safety,” said lead investigator Martin Möckel, MD, PhD, from Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, in Berlin, Germany.

“This is the first interventional trial to study whether it is safe to discharge suspected ACS patients who test troponin and copeptin negative at admission. Using this strategy, a high proportion of patients could be discharged early, thus unnecessary treatments and resources could be saved, causing a substantial benefit for patients and health care providers.”


Emergency departments worldwide face increasing overcrowding and patients with signs and symptoms which might be caused by an acute coronary syndrome are very common, even though only around 15% of these patients are ultimately diagnosed with an acute myocardial infarction as the underlying disease, explained Dr. Möckel.

“Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is therefore a major clinical need, saving the health care system time and resources and patients unnecessary stress, anxiety and other risks associated with hospitalization.”

Current guidelines recommend that patients receive serial troponin testing to confirm that hospital discharge is appropriate, but this testing delays definitive action, he said.


“The new biomarker copeptin has been shown to be elevated in patients first presenting with acute MI, and when combined with the  cardiac troponin biomarker has an excellent negative predictive value for acute MI.  However, an early discharge strategy based on combining these two tests has never been assessed prospectively.”
BIC-8, a multicentre, open, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 902 patients with an initial negative troponin test to assess this strategy.

In the experimental arm (n=451), patients with a negative copeptin test (less than 10 pmol/L) were discharged into ambulant care, with a scheduled outpatient visit within 72 hours, while those with a positive copeptin test  received standard treatment according to current guidelines.

Among patients in the standard arm (n=451), copeptin results were not available to treating staff and patients were treated according to current guidelines.

At 30 days of follow-up the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar in both groups (5.46% in the experimental arm vs 5.5% in the standard arm), but emergency room discharge rates were significantly higher in the experimental arm (66% vs 12%; P < 0.001).

The results support the consideration of a new treatment algorithm in low-to-intermediate risk patients with suspected ACS, said Dr. Möckel.

“Patients with a negative troponin and a negative copeptin result at admission can safely be discharged if the final clinical assessment is consistent with this decision, as long as a timely diagnostic work-up is done in the outpatient setting,” he said.
  
However, the clinical judgment of the treating physician is of utmost importance, he stressed.

“If his or her final clinical assessment excludes discharge due to high suspicion of ACS, perhaps due to recurrent symptoms or an updated history, the patient should not be discharged despite negative biomarker results.”


oma

  • Senior gebruiker
  • ****
  • Berichten: 10,711
Reactie #79 Gepost op: 3 september 2013, 08:19:05
Amsterdam, The Netherlands – Tuesday 3 September 2013: The blood pressure lowering drug aliskiren did not improve coronary artery disease when given to patients who had prehypertension, results of the Aliskiren Quantitative Atherosclerosis Regression Intravascular Ultrasound Study (AQUARIUS) reveal.

The findings, reported at the European Society of Cardiology Congress with simultaneous publication in the Journal of the American Medical Association, offer new insight into the value of lowering blood pressure beyond prehypertensive goals, suggested lead investigator Stephen Nicholls MBBS, PhD, Deputy Director at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Professor of Cardiology at the University of Adelaide and Consultant Cardiologist at the Royal Adelaide Hospital in Adelaide,  Australia.

“In the AQUARIUS study, although greater blood pressure lowering was observed in the aliskiren treatment group, we did not observe significant slowing of disease progression,” he noted.

“While these findings do not support the use of aliskiren for regression or prevention of progression of coronary atherosclerosis, prespecified exploratory findings in the trial suggests there may be some other potential  benefits in patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease and blood pressure levels treated to goal…although the current clinical findings are inconclusive,”  he added.


AQUARIUS was a prospective, randomised, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial conducted at 103 centers in Europe, Australia and North and South America.

It included patients aged 35 years or older with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease, prehypertensive blood pressure at baseline (systolic blood pressure between 125 and 139 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg) and two additional cardiovascular risk factors.

Eligibility required a target blood vessel for imaging with at least 20% and less than 50% stenosis.

After receiving aliskiren 150 mg for 1 week to assess tolerability a total of 613 participants were randomized to receive either aliskiren 300 mg (n=305) or placebo daily (n=308).

Baseline intravascular ultrasonography was used to indentify a target artery for imaging with the primary endpoint of the study being percent atheroma volume (PAV), and a secondary outcome being total atheroma volume (TAV) - measures of the amount of plaque present in the coronary artery.

Among the 458 participants (74.7%) who remained in the study for more than 72 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between those treated with aliskiren or placebo.

“We observed a trend towards a favorable effect on plaque progression in the aliskiren group, although the difference from the placebo group was not statistically significant,” said Dr. Nicholls. “As a result, the overall result was considered neutral.”

PAV decreased by 0.33%  in the aliskiren group and increased by 0.11% in the placebo group (P=0.08), and TAV, decreased by 4.vs 2.1mm3  respectively (P=0.18).
 
Regression of PAV was observed in 56.9% of aliskiren-treated patients and 48.9% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.09), whereas TAV regressed in 64.4% vs 57.5% respectively (P=0.13).

However, pre-specified exploratory findings showed significantly greater blood pressure reductions in the aliskiren-treated group (systolic -2.9 vs -0.8 mmHg, P=0.007; and diastolic -2.0 vs. -0.4 mmHg, P=0.003).

The exploratory analysis also revealed a favorable effect on clinical events, which was “a surprising result, given that the study was small,” said Dr. Nicholls.
 
There were fewer major cardiovascular events (8.5%vs. 16.2%, P=0.004), and non-fatal myocardial infarctions (0.3% vs.2.6%, P=0.02) in the aliskiren group), however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously he stressed.

“They represent a prespecified exploratory endpoint in a trial not formally powered to assess clinical outcomes and are based on small numbers of events, but should be considered hypothesis-generating findings that may warrant further investigation.”

The findings add to the ongoing debate over what is the ideal blood pressure for patients with coronary disease, he said.

“The guidelines say for most patients that is 140 mmHg, although we do not have large trials to tell us definitively whether a patient at 135 mmHg is OK or whether we should do more. There are some suggestions within this study that there may be some extra benefit, but the findings are inconclusive and we need larger studies.”